Truth; A Gift for Scribblers, second ed. William J. Snelling. Boston: B. B. Mussey, 1832.
-----
[title page]
A
GIFT FOR SCRIBBLERS.
SECOND EDITION,
WITH ADDITIONS AND EMENDATIONS,
BY
WILLIAM J. SNELLING.
———
‘Defensor culpæ dicet mihi, “Fecimus et nos Hæc juvenes.” Esto. Desîsti nempe nec ultrà Fovisti errorem.’ Juvenal.
“You think this cruel?—take it for a rule,
No creature smarts so little as a fool.”—Pope.
BOSTON:
PUBLISHED BY B. B. MUSSEY, 63, CORNHILL.
LEONARD W. KIMBALL ….PRINTER.
———
1832.
-----
[copyright page]
Benjamin B. Mussey,
in the Clerk’s office of the District Court of Massachusetts.
-----
[p. iii]
TO THE FIRST EDITION.
—
I have often said to myself, when disgusted by newspaper puffs of would-be poets, ‘Why suffer thyself to be incommoded by things so trivial? The people endure these vermin—why shouldst not thou?’ Satisfied with this mental adjuration, I have heretofore been silent, esteeming satire too noble a weapon to be employed in extirpating insects. At last, the evil has become intolerable; the whole atmosphere is filled with the legs and wings of all sorts of ephemera. I take up my newspaper at breakfast, and at the first glance encounter a violent panegyric on some youth, who has undertaken to fly on wings more waxy than even those of Icarus. I sally forth, and am asked by the first friend I meet, ‘Have you seen ——’s new poem?[’] I go to the Athenæum, take up an American review, and open at Mr. Doolittle’s ‘Horæ Ambrosianæ, a Poem,’ and am assured ‘that Mr. Doolittle, with a little more energy, and a great deal less negligence, will do much to establish a first rate, tip-top reputation.’ go to my shoe-maker for a pair of boots, and he presents me with the Daily ——, in which there is a copy of verses by the celebrated poetess, Mrs. Blue, and asks my opinion of her prospect of immortality. Thus am I annoyed from morning till night.
-----
p. iv
I have no quarrels with, or personal dislike to, any individual of the scribbling race. I wish they could write better; I wish they would give more time and attention to their productions; or, I wish they would not write at all. The conductors of newspapers have been in the habit, in almost all instances, of flattering our young aspirants. These must now hear the language of truth; for I verily believe that the itch of rhyme has withdrawn more persons from the useful pursuits of life than the doctrine of rotation in office, which is a bold word; and I therefore consider it my bounden duty to sacrifice some of these young cocks of Bantam to Esculapius, in hopes of retrieving the sanity of the rest.
I attack none in a personal manner, who have not themselves offended in the same sort. To these I say, “Those who live in houses of glass should not throw stones.” True, you have thrown one at me; but you have at others, and I take it upon me to punish your repeated breaches of the peace in a summary manner. “What is sauce for goose is sauce for gander also.” May the castigation produce amendment, to the extent that you shall never be scurrilous again. Though some of you be incorrigible, such may be made useful by way of examples.
With respect to the propriety of serving up authors, some of whom are respectable as private individuals, for the public amusement, I can do no better than quote some sentiments of Byron, in whch I heartily concur.
‘An author’s works,’ he says, ‘are public property; he who purchases may judge, and publish his opinion if he pleases: my object is, if possible, to make others write better.’
Again;—‘No one can wish more than the author, that some known and able writer had undertaken their exposure; but in the absence of the regular physician, a country practitioner may, in cases of absolute necessity, be allowed to prescribe his nostrum, to prevent the extension of so deplorable an epidemic, provided there be no quackery in his treatment of the malady.’
I have been told that caustic reproof may blight the hopes of a young and sensitive poet, and stop him short in the beginning
-----
p. v
of his career. In some very few instances this may have happened. The laws of the land, too, and much more often, operate hardly on individuals; but this consideration is no argument against their beneficial influence, and is not suffered to obstruct the course of justice. By a parity of reasoning, a poet must sometimes endure severe, but just criticism, for the good of the community. Moreover, I believe that few plants worth cultivating are so delicate as to be incapable of bearing wind and sun.
Wherever I have found ability at all above mediocrity, I have acknowledged it, though obscured by a thousand blots. Where talent does not exist, the literary hopes of the writer ought to be blasted, even for his own welfare; and it will give me pleasure to perform the service.
-----
[p. 6 blank]
-----
[p. 7]
TO THE SECOND EDITION.
Nothing is farther from the intention of the author of ‘Truth’ than to offer aught like apology for any part of the contents of his first edition. He could not condescend to deprecate the enmity of his maligners, even did he hold them in less contempt than he does. He has had abuse enough to satisfy a moderate appetite already, and he expects more. It is the privilege of the beaten to rail, and he is perfectly willing that those who consider themselves aggrieved by him, or their friends, should exercise it at his expense. However, he has been burthened with some imputations, which respect for public opinion impels him to rebut. It has been said that he wrote to revenge himself on the critics, that he resented some slight with which his own writings had been received, and that he was actuated by vanity, ill-nature and personal animosity.
The truth is, he had no acquaintance with any of the subjects of his criticism: he had never any quarrel with any one of them, and could not therefore have been prompted by hatred. He dissected poets with as much good nature as he ever dissected a goose.
He had no reason to complain of criticism: none of his works had ever been noticed by the press with less than decided appro-
-----
p. 8
bation. He had no slight to avenge. If he be vain, the critics have made him so.
A new edition of “Truth” was printed some time since, but was so badly executed that the author was obliged to suppress it. He hopes the statement of this fact will be a sufficient apology for the delay.
-----
[p. 9]
SCENE, THE AUTHOR’S GARRET.
Dramatis Personæ .....The Author and a Friend.
—
FRIEND.
What! bent to write?
AUTHOR.
Ay, more; to print again.
FRIEND.
Can neither love nor fear your mood restrain?
Will you, a man to wealth, to fame unknown,
Against a host of foes make head alone?
An insect swarm infests the land, ’tis true;
But pray, my meddling friend, what’s that to you?
If fools will still be fools, why need you care?
AUTHOR.
A public grief is ev’ry man’s affair.
If in my neighbor’s corn a swine I see,
Shall I stand idle?—it concerns not me?—
-----
p. 10
No to; my biting whip-lash shall not spare
To teach him that I’ll have no grunting there.
And shall those swine, two-legged though they be,
That mar our country’s music, ’scape scot-free?
FRIEND.
To carry out your swinish trope, my friend,
Your two-legg’d swine is apt to turn and rend:
Then, swine on four legs, though a stiff-neck’d race,
May, being soundly beaten, learn their place;
But that no upright porker ever will—
You preach to blocks—you over-rate your skill.
No task so hard was ever set at school,
As of his folly to convince a fool.
AUTHOR.
I care no more than does the Pope of Rome,
How lofty each in his own eyes may loom:
Let Paulding still persist, let Mellen fill
The Token’s page with dribblings from his quill;
I hope not their reform—with him who buys,
As well as him who writes, my business lies;
If these are bent to palm upon the land,
Help’d by th’ accomplice press, their “notes” of hand,
I’ll nail them fast to some oft open’d door,
Inscrib’d, “worth just my weight in rags—no more.”
-----
p. 11
FRIEND.
Who thanks you, if the public good you prize
Above your own?—Know, Quixote, he who tries
To prove his neighbor’s judgment faulty, gains
Contempt and hatred only for his pains:
Take Butler’s word, a pleasure quite as sweet
Is felt in being cheated as to cheat.
AUTHOR.
If neither thanks nor praise the world afford,
Well-doing is, to me, its own reward.
FRIEND.
Be not so ultra-patriotic, think
What cruel guerdon pays your waste of ink:
Webb’s* trusty cudgel, Whittier’s paring-knife,
Clark’s mad-dog slaver, may assail your life:
Think, Willis, woman’s likeness and her foe,
Stands, both hands full of filth, in act to throw,
* I have known this valiant soldier and acute critic long, and there has been small pleasure in the acquaintance. He is the identical “Senior Editor” who left the management of the New York Courier and Inquirer with the avowed intention of doing a deed of arms at Washington. He was frightened out of his purpose, however, and almost out of his wits, by the apparition of a pistol with “a mahogany stock and barrel of about four inches.” Said pistol was pointed at his person by a ghost. I can pardon Mr. Webb’s virulence, but not his insolence in pretending to offer me advice.
-----
p. 12
Behind his dull file-leader Clapp;* you stand
The mark of all the boobies in the land;
* Clapp is the editor of a hebdomadal sheet, which, from its enormity, has been aptly termed “The Weekly Acre of Trash.” It is but justice to admit that the editor and paper are worthy of each other. The said Weekly Acre was the organ through which Master Willis gave the public a characteristic epigram. That the author and publisher may be sure of the infamy they courted, here it is:
Oh Smelling Joseph! Thou art like a cur,
(I’m told thou once didst live by hunting fur)
Of bigger dogs thou smellest, and in sooth,
Of one extreme, perhaps, canst tell the “Truth;”
’Tis a wise thrift, and shows thou know’st thy powers,
To leave thy “North West Tales” and take to smelling ours!”
I hate to be in debt, and therefore entreat Mr. Willis to accept the three following epigrams, and consider his favor six times requited:—
1st. I liv’d by hunting fur thou say’st—so let it be—
But tell me, Natty, had I hunted thee,
Had not my time been thrown away, young sir?
And eke my powder?—puppies have no fur.
2nd. Our tails?—thou own’st, then, to a tail—
I’ve scann’d thee o’er and o’er;
But though I guess’d thy species right
I was not sure before.
3rd. Our savages, authentic travelers say,
To natural fools religious honors pay—
Had’st thou been born a wigwam’s smoke and dirt in,
Nat, thine apotheosis had been certain.
-----
p. 13
And though the marksmen boast nor skill nor wit,
Some random shot may haply reach you yet.
AUTHOR.
Rail, Clark, Webb, Willis—’tis your only way
To gt a hearer—thick skinn’d Whittier, bray:
One’s heels, the other’s poor attempts to bite,
My pity, not my wrath or fears excite.
What care I that they flatter or condemn?
They rail at me—I gaily laugh at them.
When curs from ev’ry dunghill bay the moon,
Who ever heeds the key-note of the tune?
FRIEND.
A granite mansion stands in Lev’rett-street,
Where Massachusetts lodgings gives, and meat,
And free of charge, to him whose tongue or pen
Denies the merits of his fellow men.
Beware the law of libel.
AUTHOR.
Faith, not I;
The law and Mr. Badlam I defy.
I call’d John Neal a madman, Willis half
A man, and Finn a dunce, and Lunt a calf:
If that be construed into grave offence,
Our courts admit the truth in evidence;
-----
p. 14
And such an action will be deem’d a sham—
See J. N. Maffit vs. Buckingham.
FRIEND.
Take timely counsel; if your dire disease
Admits no cure, it needs not to displease.
Let Nature’s works, or Art’s, your fancy move,
The deeds of heroes, or the pangs of love.
Long have you practis’d solely to offend;
Now change your note, and make each foe a friend.
I grant our poets’ faults are not a few;
But some, ’tis thought, have striking beauties too:
Be these your theme.
AUTHOR.
Some public prints there are,
So prone to puffing all poetic ware,
That us’d, as though to look at pictures, roll’d
In tubes, they magnify a hundred fold
An author’s merit; and, what’s stranger still,
Make much that don’t exist, and never will:
Thro’ some such microscope have reach’d your eyes
The beauties you would have me eulogise.
I’d gladly pitch my pipe to praise—but how?
I’ve seen no subject, and I see none now,
Save some half dozen.
-----
p. 15
FRIEND.
Those who read your strains
Complain that gall, not ink, your paper stains:
They think, so hotly you your victims seek,
Not truth or justice, but your passions speak:
With equal wrath you hawks and flies pursue,
And wield a cudgel where a straw would do:
You know no diff’rence of degree in sin;
The scholar Pierpont and the punster Finn
Fare just alike. Amend—’tis not too late;
Erase, give credit, alter, mitigate:
To please the public, take a milder tone;
For sweets catch many flies, but acids none.
AUTHOR.
I know that Dulness to her sons and heirs
Gives not their heritage in equal shares:
The goddess mother of our rhyming band
Has squeez’d her poppies with a partial hand;
On one of Whittier’s eyes the juice she tried,
And bless’d that hopeful youth with one blind side;
At favor’d Fairfield’s visage aiming right,
She clos’d both optics in eternal night;
Then at her best lov’d Morris hurl’d the bowl,
And in a flood of folly drench’d his soul.
Howbeit, shall I the scale of fools explore?
The best deserves the whip, the worst no more.
-----
p. 16
Shall one to praise or pardon make pretence
Because he digs the grave of Common Sense
But five feet deep, while others sink to ten?
Grant it—and see him go to work again.
No, this Americo-Arcadian* breed
Need no such spur to make them show their speed.
’Tis perilous to compliment a dunce;
’Twere better knock him on the head at once.
Alonzo Lewis makes this problem clear;
I gave him six scant lines of praise last year,
And mark the consequence—his hand he mends,
And works, for very life, to show his friends
His firm resolve the world’s contempt to brave,
And bear the name of blockhead to his grave.
FRIEND.
Who takes another man to task, should be
From all the failings that he censures free.
Are you thus faultless? did you never scrawl
A verse you’d give a finger to recall?
Or give our bards just reason to condemn,
And do by you as you have done by them?
AUTHOR.
No doubt—no doubt—then let my verses be
Damn’d as they merit? prithee spare not me:
* Arcadia was famous for its jack-asses.
-----
p. 17
Lay on; I’m ready; let the buffet fall;
Come Blanche, come Sweetheart, “little dogs and all:”
Take all my trash, with strictest rigor try it;
I’ll weigh your censure well, and profit by it.
But though my house be glass, my arm has bone
And nerve sufficient to propel a stone
As well as his that’s better lodg’d, my eye
As well my neighbor’s windows can espy.
I wish, indeed, some abler hand than mine
Would vindicate our country and the Nine;
But since none offers, since I stand alone,
Coragio! be the thankless task my own.
FRIEND.
Well, since the voice of friendship not avails,
Go!—via! pande vela—spread your sails!
-----
[p. 18 blank]
-----
[p. 19]
A
GIFT FOR SCRIBBLERS.
—————
Moths, millers, gnats, and butterflies I sing;
Far-darting Phœbus, lend my strain a sting;
Much courted virgins,* long enduring Nine,
Screw tight the catgut of this lyre of mine:
If Fairfield, Dawes and Whittier ask your aid,
If Willis follow rhyming as a trade;
If Lunt and Finn to Pindus’ top aspire;
I too may blameless beg one spark of fire;
Not such as glow’d in Pope’s or Dryden’s song—
With less assistance I can get along;
To Byron’s bow and shafts I lay no claim;
He shot at hawks, I but at insects aim:
But grant, since I must war on little things,
Just flame enough to singe their puny wings;
* ——Narrate, puellæ
Pierides: prosit mihi vos dixisse puellas! Juvenal.
-----
p. 20
A feather besom give, to bring them down,
And pins to stick them in my castor’s crown.
O Faust, O Faust! an’ if thy story’s true,
In thee the Devil only got his due:
In bullets moulded, and by nitre hurl’d,
Thy types had done less mischief to the world.
Thou wretch, if spirits can reply from hell,
The purpose of thy black invention tell.
Couldst thou not see thy press and printing tools
Create an endless jubilee for fools?—
Whole herds of dunces throng this luckless land,
As codfish swarm near fishy Newfoundland?—
Couldst thou not see the loathing public cramm’d
With verse on verse?—most justly art thou damn’d.
I hear a voice that cries, ‘Lift up thine hand
Against the legions of this locust band:
Let brain-sick youths the wholesome scourge endure;
Their case is urgent—spare not—kill or cure;
Hang, hang them up, like smelts upon a string,
And o’er their books a requiescat sing:
Arise,—convince thy country of her shame;
Rise, ere her genius be no more a name.’
Rous’d by the call of Duty, I obey;
I draw the sword, and fling the sheath away.
-----
p. 21
But where being?—When vermin thus abound,
No shaft I shoot can bloodless reach the ground.
Lo! paddling down the Nash-way, in a scow
Of his own building, Rufus makes his bow:
And tells how Peggy, erst the kitchen’s pride,*
Became enamor’d, pined, and whined, and died:
Then, sings how strangely salmon swim up stream,
And, stranger still, how wolves and ’peckers’ scream;
Or tells what streamlet wash’d his school-boy chin.—
Pity the booby had not fallen in!
In time, perhaps, our servile bard may find
That, riding double, one must ride behind;
And, peradventure, learn that Goldsmith’s steed
But by a Goldsmith can be urg’d to speed.
A pause,—and Rufus croaks another air,
About a sprite that dwelleth every where:†
He’s wrong; for ‘Beauty’s Spirit’ never shines
Through the impervious dulness of his lines.
His last sheet printed, and his volume out,
Vainglorious Rufus anxious looks about,
* A scullion is, doubtless, a very useful and respectable personage in her sphere. Every one knows that; but it required a Dawes to discover that “a saucepan is an instrument fit for the music of the angelic choirs.”
† “The Spirit of Beauty is every where.”—Dawes.
-----
p. 22
Anticipates due praise, and quakes with fear
Lest justice should o’ertake his offspring dear:
Superfluous care! nor praise nor blame is heard,
Not even snarling Prentice growls a word.
Stung with the slight, resolv’d to rouse the pack,
On the whole town he pens a dire attack:
His Strokes and Strictures* meet with equal scorn,
And, like his poems, leave the press still-born.
The fount to which, in Boston’s earlier day,
Men came to drink, and went refresh’d away—
The fame our pious pilgrim fathers sought,
To hear the Savior’s vital precepts taught—
The church—is now the club-room of small wits;
The desk’s the nest where Dulness brooding sits,
And hatches chicks, in voice and mind her own,
Like Croswell, Ware, Peabody,† Deane‡ and Doane;
Who thrive upon their mother’s milk so well,
They chirp in numbers as they chip the shell.
* I ought to mention here, for the benefit of those who are so unhappy as not to have seen the production, that a very kind and gentle satire was published in Boston, entitled “Strokes and Strictures.” It was not puffed, even by the Traveller! Since the publication of the first edition of Truth, I have learned that it preceded “The Valley of the Nashaway.” The error, however, is not material—it was seen by very few persons.
† Peabody. Author of an unnatural “Hymn to Nature.”
‡ Mr[.] Deane would not have been noticed but to make the rhyme. His first acknowledged work was “The Populous Village,” a poem! May it be his last!
-----
p. 23
Hark! little wool, great cry! that doleful whine
Is Pierpont’s, chanting “Airs of Palestine:” Prime parson, but poor poet; sells, in short,
Soup for the alms-house at a cent a quart.*
His motive’s good;—and yet, I grieve to tell,
The crude concoction never would, will sell;
Scarce any food to Yankees comes amiss,
But saw-dust broth had pleas’d them more than this.
Pierpont, a man may be of judgment clear,
Have taste, and talent, and a faultless ear,
* ‘Airs of Palestine’ was printed (perhaps written) for the benefit of the poor in Baltimore. Their dividend of the profits, unless I am misinformed, amounted to $0.
Note to Second Edition. There is not a paragraph in this work which I have not heard commended on the score of justice by some, and condemned by others. To judge by the plurality of voices, I have done Mr. Pierpont injustice. I would fain make him the amende honorable, and am willing to say that no one can respect his person, profession, character and talents more than I do. However, when I read his “Portrait,” and “Airs of Palestine,” I thought their chance for immortality very small, and I have been confirmed in my opinion by seeing them praised in the American Monthly, since defunct. My lines, therefore shall stand, to bear witness against Mr. P. or myself, as the public shall decide.
Mr. Pierpont’s hymns and occasional pieces are really such as he need not be ashamed of. If I have formed a wrong estimate of his performances, I shall be glad to be informed wherein my error consists, but I cannot acknowledge myself in the wrong till convinced that I am so.
-----
p. 24
Yet be no poet: be advised by me;
Stick to thy pulpit; let the Muses be;
Or try thy wings in flights of lesser length,
In height and distance suited to their strength:
Still let thy notes, like those of that sweet bird
That strew’d the babes with leaves, near home be heard;
Again if thou set’st out for Palestine,
The fate of Icarus, good man, is thine.
A sail, my muse! Pursue in full career;
Train our bow-chaser on this privateer;
This pirate rather, for his flag is black—
Let’s lay the whip upon his recreant back.
’Tis stupid Croswell, whose marauding sword
Has carv’d his verse from Wordsworth’s,* word for word.
I’ll take hi stolen goods, but harm him not;
Poor Devil! he’s not worth another shot.
* One of Wordsworth’s pieces, entitled “Sonnet Vindicatory,” was copied into the Episcopal Watchman, of which Croswell was editor, without credit, and in the manner in which his editorial verses always appeared. This might have been accidental, but the piece was afterwards published by Kettle as Croswell’s. As its putative author took no pains to divest himself of the borrowed feather, I consider the charge in the text established. His lawful property nobody will take form him.
-----
p. 25
If clumsy Vulcan thrum Apollo’s lyre
’Tis ten to one his fingers snap the wire—
Each to his trade—there’s Edward,* learned, wise,
Great in the world’s opinion, vainly tries
To climb Parnassus, makes his reader sick
(To use his own bad rhyme) of Alaric.†
The empty lines contain instruction yet;
They prove “poeta nascitur, non fit.”
See, Doane,‡ with feeble foot, but front of brass,
Puts forth his foot from cloud to cloud to pass:§
Why thus reluctant, Doane?—I prithee, tell?
He built the bridge, and knows its weakness well.
* Author of “The Dirge of Alaric the Goth.” As Willis has damned this poem, which he calls a ballad, by praising it in the same number of his magazine which extols the Comic Annual, it is unnecessary to say more of it.
† This couplet, which violates sense as well as the rules of rhythm, runs thus:
“And Roman hearts shall long be sick
When men shall think of Alaric.
‡ The Rev. Mr. Doane I threw into the line where he first appeared as a make-weight, or rather as we take a glass of water, in itself insipid, to wash the taste of three or four disagreeable pills out of the mouth. He has written two or three good things, which ought not, however, to excuse a cart load of trash. His book is called “Songs by the Way.”
§ See one of Mr. Doane’s pieces called “The Cloud Bridge,” or The Bridge in the Clouds: I forget which.
-----
p. 26
But hark! he puts his raven voice in tune,
And chants a sonnet to “The Silent Moon:”
Would that he too were silent! now he sings,
“O had I but a pair of pigeon’s wings!”*
I would thou hadst, so high that thou might’st soar
The ear of man should never hear thee more!
Yet Doane with truth may boast of merits two;
His paltry pieces are both short and few:
And still his book would be the more improv’d
The more the number of the lines remov’d.
To notice Doane and Croswell, Mister Ware,
And let thee pass unmark’d, were hardly fair;
Thou stand’st, in truth, above these little men;
So does the sparrow differ from the wren.
I’ve read thy verses, and if right I deem,
Thy “Vision” † was at best a nightmare dream:
Some heavy food that undigested lay
Upon thy organs, did thy wits bewray:
Not Liberty, but vile Rebellion came,
And set thee free from all restraint of shame,
* This morsel of melody has for its title, “O had I the Wings of a Dove!” I hope Mr. Doane will excuse me for making an iambus of an anapest, especially as the alteration is so trivial. I could not otherwise have introduced his line into my measure.
† Mr. Ware’s longest piece of versification is entitled “A Vision of Liberty.”
-----
p. 27
And sense; but courage! once thy brain begat
A good prize poem; rest thy fame on that.
Of all the notes of all our cleric friends
We hear thine least—it therefore least offends.
O Death! awhile thy vulgar aims give o’er;
Scatter the seeds of cholera no more;
Thy task of watching over beds of wo
Depute to tried physicians, sure, if slow:
If I last year did try my very best
To give thy charnel chaps a little rest;
If I thy reaping-hook relentless bore,
And mow’d down reputations by the score;
If, butcher, thou hast not too much to do
In Poland and in plague-doom’d Russia too,
Leave riding on the whirlwind and the storm,
And come and help me work a grand reform.
Thou know’st how little mortal might avails
To still these cleric would-be nightingales;
Then come, with twice the speed of seven-league boots,
And grub up their pretensions by the roots:
I would not have thee touch their persons—no—
But pray, no mercy to their verses shew:
O haste! in post haste, be this business sped;
Before thou com’st their poems else are dead.
-----
p. 28
Here ’s milk-and-water Mellen, just from Maine;
His native fogs condens’d upon his brain.
Where gottest thou, O Mellen, so much brass,
To think thy farthings might for guineas pass?
‘Sad Tales and Glad Tales’—very sad indeed;—
Sad ‘Dreams’ and sadder ‘Visions’ next succeed;
Saddest of all,—to make his foes rejoice,
In strain satiric last he lifts his voice;
And, bent on taking common sense by storm,
Calls on his kindred dunces to reform;
Vainglorious deeming, that to christian ears
His howl will seem the music of the spheres.
What time the brazen poet rav’d and sung,
Misusing shamefully the English tongue,
The only blows he ever made to tell,
On taste, and on his readers’ patience fell.
When some sharp voice beyond its compass strains
And, knife-like, thrills through marrow, nerves, and brains,
Then, reader, think on Mellen; for a while
He sung and made th’ indulgent public smile;
But raise his voice so high!—his case is bad;
Bring a straight jacket; sure, the man is mad:
He write a satire!—he presume to call
(Himself the very longst ear’d of all)
* O medici, mediam pertundite venam!—Juvenal.
-----
p. 29
His fellow asses!—he presume to chide
At zanies!—’twas a downright fratricide.
His impudence, restricted to the bar,
Would push his fortune, heaven but knows how far.
“But is his work so very dull?” you ask.
Go through the all-unutterable task
Of reading: if your judgments then disclose
Whether ’tis rhyme or blank, or verse or prose,
’Tis more than mine can, though I read it through:
You stare,—upon my sacred word ’tis true.
Unnatural Mellen, how, how didst thou dare
Fowls of thine own dull feather thus to tear?
Were the same measure meted out to thee
How great, poor jack-daw, would thy sufferings be!*
Dismissing Mellen to the state of mist,
The name of Paulding† next adorns the list;
A name well worthy of no second place
On the dark record of the land’s disgrace.
* I trust I shall be pardoned for not treating Mellen with the severity he deserves. It is true, few American writers have done, or continued to do, so much to degrade the literary reputation of the country, but no one of them sustains a better character as a man. To this consideration he owes the indulgence with which I treat him.
† Repeated failures have not convinced this man of his imbecility. He still continues to write, and may be considered incorrigible.
-----
p. 30
When first ambitious hopes his heart inspir’d,
The itch,* congenial theme, his fancy fired:
A theme that Nature did express devise,
To find his hand its proper exercise:
So well his pen the subject seem’d to match,
And brought his thoughts so promptly to the scratch,
That all who read, this common inference drew,
He wrote with feeling, and from knowledge too.
On mountain ridges, over stump and stone,
His coach poetic next goes jolting on,†
Until the passengers, with tears and groans,
Complain of aching heads and broken bones,
And swear, if once they reach the level plain,
Never to patronize that line again;
But rather go on foot for all their lives
Than trust the coach that such a Jehu drives.
Then last, and worse by far than all the rest,
Stalks forth the blackguard “Lion of the West,”‡
* The Lay of the Scottish Fiddle, is a very miserable parody. I read it about ten years ago, since which I have not seen a copy.
† The Back Woodsman, a Poem. This is not like any work of Homer, or Pope, or Dryden, or Byron. All that can be said positively of it is, that many of the lines appear to have been intended for pentameters.
‡ If a playwright should take from Joe Miller all the blunders ascribed to Irishmen, and put them into the mouth of a single [p. 31] character, intended to represent the nation, that character would be as much an Irishman as Nimrod Wildfire is a Kentuckian. No such person as Nimrod Wildfire was ever seen on the Ohio or Mississippi. He would be as ridiculous there as he is here. His language was never the language of common parlance even among the boatmen.
The “Lion of the West” is not exactly the last of Paulding’s works. There is also a novel called the “Dutchman’s Fire Side.” If we were not told in the outset that the characters are Dutch, we should never discover it from the text. Paulding’s Indians, too, are by no means like any Indians I have ever seen. But enough; I have wasted more words on the book than it is worth.
-----
p. 31
Hight Nimrod Wildfire, one to all intents
A libel on the land he represents:
Extravagance, vulgarity and rant,
The hackney’d gleanings of a hackney’d cant,
Make up his speech.—Ah! Paulding, thou hadst best
Beware the vengeance of th’ insulted West:
Shouldst thou beyond the Laurel Ridge appear,
Not Ashe or Fearon had such cause for fear.
Hast thou, my reader, felt the frowns of Fate?
Hast lost thy purse, thy character, estate?
Has ev’ry cherish’d hope thy breast forsook?
Hast thou no trade?—No matter—write a book.
Try prose—or, better still, poetic flights,
For Brother Jonathan in verse delights;
So shall the papers all extol thy book,
And thou, in time, thyself a press o’erlook.
-----
p. 32
What though on thee the Muses never smil’d,
Nor Alma Mater owns thee for her child?
What though thy work be careless, flat and tame?
To Yankee editors ’tis all the same:
Fear not the whipping to thy folly due,
Some “Damn’d good natur’d friend” shall help thee through.
But if thou hast no editorial friend,*
Straight to some well-known print a copy send;
For that’s the current value of a puff;
Then send a copy, and have praise enough,
Or what’s a very common way to bribe,
Go to the printing-office—and subscribe.
Bribe, bribe the editor, and hear him swear
That Homer never cook’d a dish so rare.
To gain attention art thou doubtful still?
Behold what piles of drugs the bookshops fill:
Here Wetmore stands; Alonzo here is seen;
There Willis, with his Monthly Magazine.
When these, and such as these, to publish dare,
Needst thou—need any one on earth—despair?
But, if thy book be good, beware of spite;
The dog that wags his tail for sops, can bite.
Does any critic view thee with distaste?
To stretch the hand of Friendship forth make haste.
* If editorial be not a good English word, it ought to be. There is no other in the language that expresses the same ideas. I shall, therefore, use it, though it has not the sanction of Johnson.
-----
p. 33
All provocation given straight recall,
Else shall thy first-born offspring pay for all.
Lo! one, review’d himself, in turn reviews
Another, whom his outrag’d tailor sues,
his wrath, and reaches
To pour them on the tailor’s coats and breeches.*
These criticise from malice, these for pay,
And those for want of something else to say.
Muse, shall we not a few brief lines afford
To give poor Natty P.—— his meet reward?
What has he done to be despised by all
Within whose hands his harmless scribblings fall?
Why, as in band-box trim† he walks the streets,
Turns up the nose of every man he meets,
As if it scented carrion? Why, of late,
Do all the critics claw his shallow pate?
True, he’s a fool;—if that’s a hanging thing,
Let Lewis, Mellen, Woodworth also swing.
Let but a school-boy pen a twaddling theme,
Ye Gods—how Pa exults!—How Ma will scream!
So Natty,‡ having with a world of pain
Transmuted sacred prose to verse profane,
* There is a merchant tailor and draper in Congress Street who can bear witness of the truth of this couplet.
† Vanus et Euganeâ quantumvis mollior agnâ.—Juvenal.
‡ It is not my wish to accoutre any person with a nick-name; but as it is impossible to reduce the name Nathaniel to any sort [p. 34] of harmony, I am compelled to use the abbreviation Nat, or Natty. This is countenanced by Persius, who, in the line below, seems to have had a prophetic vision of this worthy.
-----
p. 34
Was petted, flatter’d, sent forthwith to college,
To store his shallow skull with classic knowledge.
O what a tip-top tailor thus was spoil’d!
Had he but sat cross-legg’d what Snip had moil’d
To so much purpose?—He had cabbag’d then,
As now, and clipt the cloth of better men:
No goose had hiss’d like his; his want of skill
Had made our coats and breeches look as ill
As now it does mere paper;—then his shears
Had spar’d old authors, and his voice our ears.
Not quite a woman, by no means a man,
Escap’d from birch the joyful stripling ran,
In tuneful mood, with smutty rhymes to greet
The ear of ev’ry girl that walk’d the street;
Rhymes that his pitying friends essay’d to hush;
Rhymes that no woman read without a blush.
Awhile he graced the Statesman’s ribald page
With the rank breathings of his prurient age;
And told the world how many a half-bred miss,
Like Shakespeare’s fairy, gave an ass a kiss:
Long did he try the art of sinking on
The muddy pool he took for Helicon;
-----
p. 35
Long did he delve and grub, with fins of lead,
At its foul bottom for precarious bread.
Then kept the youth an inn, where each and all
Were serv’d with fragments from some musty stall.
At his own “Table,” whence no hungry wretch
From June to May one wholesome crumb could catch;
Where neither mental mutton, veal nor beef
To the mind’s hunger gave the least relief;
Secure no law his monthly thefts could reach,
He sold his stolen goods to all and each.
Ah, Nat! I’ve too much charity by half;—
I cannot slay and eat thee, though a calf.
Dishonest critic, and ungrateful friend,*
Still on a woman thy stale jokes expend;
Live—at thy meagre table still preside,
While foes commiserate, and friends deride;
Yet live, thy wonted follies to repeat;
Live till thy tailor’s ruin is complete;
Live, moral Atlas, be a world of scorn
For life, as now, upon thy shoulders borne;
* “Dishonest Critic.” It is well known that Willis abuses the worst of his personal enemies and praises those of his friends, without regard to their actual merit, or rather to their want of it. I forbear to explain the words “ungrateful friend,” from regard to his feelings.
-----
p. 36
Yet strut thy fleeting hour upon the stage,
An “Awful Beacon” to the rising age.*
So much for scolding; come now, Natty come
To me, poor thing, and get a sugar plum;
The rod, I think, has made thy shoulders sore,
Thou writest so much better than before.
With father’s love I’ve watch’d thy mind unfold,
And joy’d to see some spangles of pure gold:
Bright with intrinsic light “The Leper” glows,
“The Alchemist” no common talent shows.
Low though thy credit be, some hopes remain;
Write more such verse, and see it rise again.
Alas, he’s gone! the land that gave him birth
Has lost a never-failing source of mirth.
Vex not his track, O Boreas, o’er the main!
Fly, Time, and bring us back our butt again!
Since, Muse, a rest thy wearied pinions crave,
Alight, and weep on Brainard’s early grave.†
* At pulchrum est, digito monstrari, et dicier, Hic est?—Persius.
† If, in this paragraph, the appearance of an imitation of Lord Byron’s apostrophe to Kirke White shold be discovered, let it be remembered that the case of Brainard was similar to that of White. It was very difficult to avoid copying. If I had borrowed his idea, he did as much by Waller.
Brainard was far superior to Kirke White as a writer, and as [p. 37] as a man was inferior to no one that ever breathed. He wrote under every disadvantage; and, as might be expected, the faults of his writings were many. At the same time he had the stamina of poetry. Had he received encouragement sufficient to awaken his energies, his name would have lived forever. He was wholly unconscious of his own strength, and threw off his best pieces without hesitation or premeditation. To this carelessness his literary faults must be attributed. In this, too, he is not alone among the American poets, most of whom, it seems, write as carelessly as Brainard, though by no means as well. I wish I could mention three of them who equal John Gardiner Calkins Brainard, or six who even approach his excellence.
-----
p. 37
Lamented Brainard! since no living line
Records thy worth, I’ll make that merit mine:
Be mine the task to make fresh roses bloom,
And shed undying fragrance on thy tomb.
In thine own mind our cause of mourning grew—
The falchion’s temper cut the scabbard through.
Hard, hard thy lot, and great the country’s shame
That let such offspring die without his fame.
He pin’d to see the buds his brow that deck’d
Nipt by the bitter blight of cold neglect.
Torn from the tree, they perish’d, one by one,
Before their opening petals saw the sun:
While the same chilling blast that breath’d on them,
Froze the rich life-blood of the noble stem.
But not neglect, or sorrow’s rankling smart,
Could sour the kindly current of his heart;
-----
p. 38
And not the canker that consum’d his frame
Could, to the last, his eagle spirit tame;
His master harp with falt’ring hand he strung,
And music echoed from his dying tongue.
Fair Cygnus thus, while life’s last pulses roll,
Pours forth in melody his parting soul.*
Rest, Brainard!—though no sculptur’d column tell
Where sleeps the youth who lov’d our land so well,
Though not in graven brass thy praises shine,
A nobler epitaph, sweet bard, is thine:
Still be the sod where others moulder known
By such memorials—Brainard rear’d his own.
Sit down, good guests; the cloth again is spread:
Our bill of fare exhibits a calf’s head;
’Tis Lunt’s† —the brains I cannot give; the lout
Long since on Byron’s tombstone beat them out.
Lunt is no poet, he has no pretence
To taste or talent—scarce to common sense:
* This “vulgar” error belongs to the classic Ovid, and is here rendered almost word for word
Sic, ubi fata vocant, udis abjectus in herbis
——Ad vada Mændri concinit albus olor.
† George Lunt is the author of “The Grave of Byron and Other Poems.” Neal treated Byron badly, but Lunt worse, inasmuch as in the minds of his readers the name of the noble poet is associated with recollections of ineffable stupidity[.]
-----
p. 39
I search’d his scribblings for a painful hour,
To find some traces of the mighty power
Dunce Kettle* gives him; deeper as I went
I found myself the farther off the scent;
Then, wroth to be beguil’d of time by stuff
As stale, as worthless as a Traveller puff,
I tore the volume in resistless hire,
And put it where it should be—in the fire.
Lunt, bless thy great good luck! My strain shall save
Thy else forgotten poems from the grave:
Hundreds shall be deterr’d by thy disgrace.
Hung in terrorem to the rhyming race,
The Muse’s mount thy figure shall adorn,
Plac’d like a scare-crow in a field of corn.
Arch demon-raiser of the realms of rhyme,
Great horror-monger of the eastern clime,
Monk Lewis, see thy devils, great and small,
By one of Yankee breed out-devil’d all:
Scatt’ring our babes and sucklings sans remorse,
Comes Dana, charging on his spectre horse.†
He lights, to let us know how Matthew Lee
His masters [sic] weasand slit, then went to sea,
* I spell this name as it is universally pronounced, and as I believe it was spelled by those who first imported it.
† It is really deplorable that Dana should choose such topics as would disgrace the pages of a dream-book. His powers are really very great, and should be better employed.
-----
p. 40
Turn’d pirate, burnt a ship, and, strange to tell,
By his own bonfire-light rode off to hell!
Classic the theme, and classic are the words
That leave the lips of Dana’s gallows birds.
Ah! Dana, on the seas no longer roam,
But ring ‘Home Changes’ quietly at home;
Cut short, I pray thee, thy career of rhyme;
The loathsome, Sir, is not the true sublime.
But if, resolved such pictures to exhibit,
Thou needs must steal thy subjects from the gibbet,
Select thy hero from the realms of evil,
To horse again, and gallop to the Devil.
As when a rocket climbs the vault of night,
And briefly falters in its fiery flight,
Yet starts again, as it begins to fail,
Upborne by bursting blasts beneath its tail,
So over-rated Sprague is seen to rise,
Puff’d by the papers to the very skies.
His is the sterling bullion, thrice refin’d,
Right from the rich exchequer* of his mind.
* All the standard old English authors bear me out in this construction of the word exchecquer. For example—
“Rob me the king’s exchecquer, the first thing thou dost.” Henry IV.
“The king’s exchecquer,
And all his wealthy Indies could not draw me,” &c.
The Chances.
-----
p. 41
Sense, strength, and classic purity combine
With genius in his almost faultless line;
Train’d in the olden school, his tide of song
Bears truth and judgment on its breast along.
Bright, yet not dazzling, burns his steady flem;
Great is his merit—greater still his fame.
Forbid it Justice, this brave bard should lie
On the same coals that cook’d the smaller fry;
Yet to the tainted plague-spots on his hide
The friendly caustic needs must be applied.
My heart sweats blood, that he, so priz’d by all,
Should only string his harp at Mammon’s call.*
’Tis clear his bank accounts and studies clash;
He counts his numbers as he counts his cash.
Too plain his verses show the marks of toil,
And each and every distich smells of oil.†
Stern Truth declares that his is not the art
To rouse the fancy or to touch the heart.
Dead on the ear his accents often fall;
Though just, yet harsh, and something dull withal.
* He writes only for prizes and on public occasions.
† Lamp-oil is undoubtedly an essential ingredient in the composition of a poem; but the author should not show it like a lamp-lighter. Few of our songsters can be accused of this fault. However, it is better to be as redolent of oil as Sprague, than to grate on the ear for the want of it. He and Mr. Halleck run into opposite extremes; and both are capable of amendment. Together, they would produce a faultless poem.
-----
p. 42
Stoop very low, my muse, apply the lash
To J. O. Rockwell,* author of such trash
As, in this age of trash, is seldom seen—
Not even in the Monthly Magazine:
Rockwell, who somewhat conscious he’s a bore,
Signs, very properly, his pieces J. O. R.:†
Rockwell, who sometimes hammer out a line,
Perhaps by accident, that’s really fine.
That Rockwell ever writes is strange indeed—
Stranger that any can be found to read:
Yet those whose time the Statesman serves to kill,
May, with a relish, bolt this smaller pill.
’Tis plain that Portland, n the state of Maine,
Can boast no hospital for folk insane:
The fact is prov’d, by this, beyond a doubt;
John Neal and Mellen run at large about!
When the moon waxes, plaintive Mellen howls,
But Johnny, like a bull-dog, snaps and growls;
Or strikes his brother poetasters mute,
With harsh vibrations of his three stringed lute.
‘Grant me, O Lord!’ Neal’s anxious father prayed,
‘To see my son an ornament to trade.
* Mr. Rockwell was the author of a poem beginning—
He has died within the year. I cannot conscientiously retract any thing I have said of him, but I will cheerfully add that he was an industrious young man.
† Query. Jaw?
-----
p. 43
Grant him to run the race his father ran,
A noted, useful, and respected man.’
Noted he is—for so much of the prayer
Was heard, the rest was lost in empty air.
Then, in a notion shop, did Johnny find
Employ precisely fitted to his mind.
Had one mischance not happ’d, one grievous ill,
He there might sell soft soap and ‘sodder’ * still.
What time red Sirius rules th’ autumnal sky,
Then in their pans the brains of poets fry.
’Twas then, while on his master’s errands flown,
Full on Neal’s skull the raging dog-star shone:
Adieu the shop—he took to Baltimore
No jot of that small sense he had before.
From his fond parent’s eye a tear-drop fell—
His guardian angel sigh’d a last farewell.
Then, breaking bounds, behold the youth appear
Critic, and novelist, and sonnetteer.
Such novels! They deserve the name, at least;
Their like was never seen in west or east.
Such criticisms! His victims all to kill
The critic lack’d the power, though not the will;
* Soft sodder. According to Neal, there are tin pots and pans which drop in pieces when warm water is poured into them. The composition with which they are cemented he calls “soft sodder.”
-----
p. 44
He found his blows, though thick and fast applied,
Too light to penetrate each ass’s hide.
As brazen implements are ever found,
And empty casks, to yield the greatest sound,
So, louder than the rest our hero roar’d,
And over lesser owls superior soar’d.
O for a tongue! to tell how critic Neal
Broke common decency upon the wheel;
What notoriety he gain’d—what fame—
The pillory and gibbet give the same;
Till not the western hemisphere at length
Gave scope sufficient to his clumsy strength.
Then, ‘for his country’s good,’ he cross’d the tide:
‘Good bye, good riddance John,’ his country cried.
A raving lunatic he cross’d the main,
A raging madman he returns again.
Spasmodic energy, galvanic starts,
Make the sum total of his wit and parts.
Look at his poems, where each ray of light
Is by a veil of tinsel hid from sight;
Where staring nominatives strain their eyes,
And call for verbs—in vain, no verb replies;*
* I have not mentioned all, or half of Neal’s violations of grammar. As to sense, there is little or none in his poetic effusions. There is one piece, especially, (in which an eagle rising from his nest is compared to “a rank of young war-horses terribly bright,”) which sets gravity at defiance. We may, in forming [p. 45] an estimate of his handiwork, derive some assistance from his own words. “It is,{“] says he, “either poetry or downright nonsense.” Poetry it certainly is not. I am the less inclined to admit this offender to benefit of clergy, that he does not himself carry on war according to the laws of nations. Whatever prisoners have fallen into his critical hands, he has uniformly treated with more than savage barbarity. Hæc satis ad juvenem.
-----
p. 45
Where every line and every word we scan
Cries ‘I am Ego Neal’s; beat me who can!’
Yet, let me do the bilious bard no wrong—
No pilfer’d harp was his, no borrow’d song;
His freaks and pranks were his, and his alone;
His faults were infinite, but all his own:
Still, as his blund’ring fingers swept the lyre,
Amidst much smoke were seen some sparks of fire.
Neal, fare thee well! I do not wish thee worse
Than I’ve endur’d—to read thy own vile verse.
I pray the powers to patch thy mental flaw,
Or send these kindest keepers and clean straw.
This much I’ll say for L-gg-t,* —he’s not rude;
His muse begs pardon—hopes she don’t intrude;†
And begs her youth may be her pardon’s plea
For hours unprofitably spent at sea:
To praise her song though rigid Truth denies,
The modest shall find favor in my eyes.
* The author of “Leisure Hours at sea.”
† Metuens ne crimen pœna sequatur.
-----
p. 46
A glorious planet in the zenith beams;
From north to south its golden radiance streams:
’Tis one whose merit Yankee songsters feel
And imitate—but English scribblers steal:
’Tis one whose accents, whether grave or gay,
Like flames electric on the heart-strings play.
’Tis one who stands among the highest high,
‘One of the few who are not born to die;’ *
’Tis he whose strong-wing’d genius never halts:
We love him better for his very faults:
For faults in Halleck’s glowing measure run;†
So spots obscure the surface of the sun.
Still the hot spirit, the pervading soul,
Breathes through each number, and redeems the whole.
The careless poet has inscrib’d a name
Not to be blotted from the book of fame;
A name that Yankees to be born shall view,
And boast that Halleck was a Yankee too.
Dear Halleck, wither’d be the hands that dare
One laurel from thy noble brow to tear:
* I trust Mr. Halleck will excuse me for altering and using two of his noble lines. As the English journals attempted to purloin the whole piece from him, I hope he will pardon a smaller freedom in his fellow countryman.
† Mr. Halleck evidently writes carelessly. Scarce one of his lines is constructed according to the rules of rhythm; but, in him, this is a trifling fault. If this man studied like Sprague what might we not expect of him? Agnosco procerem!
-----
p. 47
Accept the tribute of a muse inclin’d
To bow to nothing, save the power of mind.
Bard of Bozzaris, shall thy native shore
List to thy harp and mellow voice no more?
Shall we, with skill like thine so nigh at hand,
Import our music from a foreign land?
While Mirror Morris chants in whimpering note,
And croaking Dana strains his screech-owl throat;
While crazy Neal to metre shakes his chains,
And fools are found to listen to his strains;
While Brooks,* and Sands,† and Smith, and either Clark
In chase of Phœbus, howl, and yelp, and bark,
Wilt thou be silent? Wake, O Halleck, wake!
Thine and thy country’s honor are at stake:
Wake, and redeem the pledge; thy vantage keep;
While Paulding wakes and writes, shall Halleck sleep?
When, bent on sport, I took my rifle gun,
And dunces were the game I warr’d upon,
How came I to o’erlook among the brood
An eyesore of such startling magnitude
As Master Sumner Lincoln Fairfield; one
Who tried all arts and trades—prov’d good at none.
* Brooks. An inveterate scribbler for the New York papers;—himself a conductor of a newspaper.
† Sands. Half author of a deceased poem called Yamoyden. I may say of him that, plus lactis habet quam sanguinis. The others will be noticed in their proper place.
-----
p. 48
Hiss’d from the stage, his coat so oft he turn’d,
His bread in such mysterious ways he earn’d,
And still such tokens of full feeding gave,
That some, uncharitably, call’d him knave.
Their thoughts have chang’d, his poems came in vogue,
And prov’d that Fairfield could not be a rogue.
In aid of Science, to extend her lore,
To let in light where all was dark before,
To hasten Freedom struggling into birth,
To sound the trump of reason through the earth,
To raise the lowly, was the Press design’d—
Bright emanation of the Godhead’s mind!
Whose silent, but not less resistless sway,
All mortals, even Yankees, must obey.
In this free land the engine’s mighty use
Is fully equalled by its foul abuse.
We trust a steam-boat to her engineers
Alone; a tailor only, wields the shears
That shape our garments, but that grand machine
In hands not fit to turn a crank is seen.
Does some smart cobbler to the winds disperse
His ends, and, like his shoe soles, creak in verse,
Some printer’s devil throw away his stick,
But by poetic maggot to the quick.
Forthwith Sir Oracle is seen to squint
At the poor public through some paltry print.
-----
p. 49
The wax still sticking to his finger’s ends,
The upstart Whittier, for example, lends
The world important aid to understand
What’s said, and sung, and printed in the land.
Uncheck’d by modesty, our Johnny Raw
Instructs his elders, and expounds the law;
Pronounces, ex cathedra, on the worth
Of poems, novels, annuals, and so forth;
And, with God-only-knows-how-gotten light,
Informs the nation what is wrong or right.
On men and things alike his strictures fall,
The self-appointed judge decides on all.
Proud of some scores of barely decent lines,
Heavens, how he swells! how bright his genius shines!
Rich in a wisdom never learn’d at school,
To him the son of Sirach was a fool.
The cushion of an editorial chair
Must, sure, inclose some spell of virtue rare!
Like Whittier, hosts, and each self-deem’d a sage,
Corrupt the taste and judgment of the age:
But, as a cure for scorpion stings is found
In crushing other scorpions on the wound,
Whatever dirt one zany’s sheets display,
Some rival zany wipes, in part, away.*
* ———Audis,
Jupiter, hæc, nec labra moves, quum mittere vocem
Debueras, vel marmoreus vel æneus?—Juvenal.
-----
p. 50
When, Whittier, with a six knot breeze astern,
Thy cock-boat from the harbor thou didst turn,
I did not deem so soon to see thee sink,
Brought to, all standing, in the sea of ink:
For thee a life more private had been best;
Ne sutor ultra—prithee guess the rest.*
Wit, like a red hot rapier, hurts two ways;
It cuts the foe and burns the hand that sways:
[*] I allude here to Whittier’s occupation, not as a matter of reproach, but to exemplify the manner in which the press is, in many instances, conducted. An artisan’s shop is a nursery of useful citizens, seldom of scholars and critics, and not often of poets. He, the best years of whose life are dedicated to the acquisition of manual dexterity, has no time to learn to judge of art, science and literature. If, however, a handicraftsman chooses to tread the paths of learning, modesty is his best policy; but neither Whittier, nor other editors of his stamp, are ever heard to make this admission, “I do not know.” The great mechanic Franklin, when he was editor of a paper, confined his remarks to subjects he understood. May Whittier, and others like him, profit by this illustrious example. Noscenda est mensura sui. Much more I could say to editors of this description:
Sed quid opus teneras mordaci radere vero
Auriculas?
Note to the Second Edition.—There are some who see in the above note an expression of disrespect, nay, contempt, for mechanics. I certainly meant no such thing, and it seems to me that their optics are so sharp as to see “what is not to be seen.” I sprung from a family of mechanics, and it would ill become me to despise my origin. There are tradesmen whose friendship is my pride.
-----
p. 51
I ask if Henry Finn’s obtrusive wit
Has e’er drawn blood, or scorch’d his fingers yet?
In conversation, o’er the cheerful glass,
A happy, quick-imagin’d pun may pass:
But puns premeditated—set to time—
And strung, like onions on a rope, in rhyme,
Though puff’d by all the editorial crew,
And sung by Henry Finn, will never do.*
Yet gains he the applauses of the press;
For fashion rules in letters as in dress.
Sam Johnson said (I half believe ’tis true)
Who makes a pun would pick a pocket too.
Finn’s hand, though not in picking pockets vers’d,
Writes “Comic Annuals”—Reader, which is worst?
One fool makes many—even timid sheep
Where the bell-wether sprang will also leap;
When one hound yelps, the others all give tongue;
Had Hood ne’er chanted, Finn had never sung.
Hood on a vicious charger bravely rides;
His mimic, Finn, a sorry ass bestrides.
Heaven help the grammar! He assaults the verbs,
And conqu’ring on, the A, B, B, disturbs;
* Alluding to certain hard-studied convivial effusions, I know not how they were received when spoken or sung, but when they appeared in print no one laughed.
-----
p. 52
Puts adverts, nouns, and adjectives to rout,
And turns the tripes of syntax inside out.
Help all good men, to put the parts of speech
Safe from his mangling poniard, out of reach.
‘Not laugh at Finn!’ exclaim the critic crew;
‘Or at his book!’ Indeed, my friends, I do.
In every self-styled Comic page, I meet
Some thrice told tale, stale joke, or low conceit.
I find his Attic salt, by every test,
Base Glauber, or but Epsom at the best.
O for some plaintive interjection! fit
To tell my pity for his hard bound wit.*
Straight in the fire, good Finn, thine Annual cast,
Let this, emphatically, be thy ‘last.’ †
Alas, that good advice in vain should be!‡
There’s no fool like the old fool yet, I see.
’Tis well that Johnston’s burin to thy style
Gives zest, and shews thy readers where to smile;
* Of all the failures of the American press, none are so lamentable as the Comic Annual—unless, indeed, the official communications of the late cabinet be adduced. Comic, indeed!
† Finn’s miserable jests were often given in the newspapers as “Finn’s last.”
‡ The public has a second number of the Comic Annual to endure; no slight infliction, judging from the last. Two dollars per page have been offered to writers. Were the editor as wise as he indisputably is well meaning, he would have declined a second literary encounter with public opinion.
-----
p. 53
’Tis well thy wealth suffices to engage
To pay for wit at dollars two per page.
O, hadst thou hit on that device before—
’Tis what no mortal ever needed more!—
Not only Boston, mother of the north,
Her hordes of letter’d Vandals vomits forth;
But senior sister Salem too, can boast
She adds at least one champion to the host.
As in the field a cumbrous twenty-four
Above less noisy twelves is heard to roar,
So pond’rous Pickering* sways the northern flank,
And bleaches volumes of undoubted blank.
Ye Salemites, my friendly counsel take—
Plant not for him the gibbet or the stake;
Let not the fear of witchcraft shake your souls,
To roast your poet, were a waste of coals—
He is no wizard. Not the less a sin
It were to hang or burn the bard of Lynn.†
* Since the above was written, Mr. P. has published a poem entitled “The Buck-wheat Cake,” which has proved that his comic powers are not to be despised, whatever his demerits as a serious writer may be. The Buck-wheat Cake is a very excellent imitation of Philip’s Splendid Shilling, and will not suffer by a comparison with Barlow’s Hasty Pudding.
† Alonzo Lewis is the father of a puling babe, the name of which I have forgotten, though I have seen it. It is now, I believe, defunct. As the annalist of Lynn, the bereaved parent need not blush.
Note to Second Edition. He redeemed his character and—lost it again, by a second volume of poems.
-----
p. 54
Lynn, once renown’d for rocks and works in leather,
Has now an awl to peg them fast together;
A bard, to chant her tides and wond’rous things,
In lines as rugged as the soil he sings.
Why should not Lewis write? We daily see
Whole troops who write as ill, almost, as he.
His were the follies of a tender age,
As proves his ev’ry line—his ev’ry page.
At last he wisely stays his mad career,
And moves with credit in an humbler sphere.
There’s balm in Gilead, Lewis, for thy case;
I’ll treat thee well—repentance merits grace:
The Lord forbid that I should treat as crimes
Regretted faults—I mean thy school-boy rhymes.
Not born to reach the ladder’s topmost round,
To know it, proves at least thy judgment sound.
Now, having given ambitious clamb’ring o’er,
Far[e]well, good Lewis;—go and sin no more.
We read, Pelides, elsewhere proof to steel,
Had yet a tender spot upon his heel:
Though no Achilles, Lewis, thou hast full
As soft a spot—nay, softer,—in thy skull:
I shew’d thee this—in vain—thy hand, instead
Of helmet, put a fool’s cap on thy head.
Thy harness yet is incomplete; provide
Forthwith apparel of rhinoceros’ hide;
-----
p. 55
’Twill serve a double purpose; to adorn
Thy limbs, and shield thee from the shafts of scorn.
Shakspeare could weekly serve a drama up,
Yet never find a vacuum in his cup;
Could well afford, from his exhaustless mine,
To fling a handful of his gold to swine:
But such a mover of the mind appears
On earth but once in twice three thousand years.
Beaumont and Fletcher, Massinger, and Ben
Still wrote and burnt, and wrote and burnt again,
A hundred times, and plied the painful file,
Before they deem’d their pieces worth the while.
Our Yankee play-wrights write like Shakspeare, fast;
But that’s the first resemblance, and the last:
There’s Stone, for instance, with his Indian king;
By aid of clap-traps, makes the boxes ring,
Throws mother Nature into ague fits,
And for his pains five hundred dollars gets;
Then, conscience smitten, for forgiveness prays,—
His work, he says, but cost him forty days.*
What’s done in hurry ill is ever done;
So says the adage, and ’tis prov’d by Stone.
Five hundred dollars!—he deserves the rack;
At least the law of Moses on his back.
* ———Dic, O vanissime, quis te
Festinare jubet?
-----
p. 56
O sun! O moon! O stars! Shall Europe see
Our country’s intellectual poverty?
What! shall the Drama to the world appear
Envelop’d in Cimmerian darkness here?
Shall Barker, Stone, and Smith, and Morris stand
To represent the talent of the land?
Forbid it, Gods! Rise, classic Hillhouse, rise;
Mix in the contest, and bear off the prize:
True, thou hast faults—what gem did ever shine
Free from the stains of earth, in any mine?
Rise in thy strength, let step-dame Britain find
Herself o’ertaken in the march of mind:
Cast all her bards, but Shakspeare, into shade—
Thy country asks it; be her voice obey’d:—
Rise in thy riper age, with taste mature—
Give us one play, forever shall endure:
Write not for “stars,” for Forrest or for Kean;
Try not thy pinion in a flight so mean,
What though her modest bard Columbia slights,
While Metamora runs for twenty nights?†
Not thine, but ours, O Hillhouse, is the shame—
Our children’s sons shall glory in thy name.
In times of old, imperial Rome, we read,
Was doomed by three sharp swords at once to bleed.
† Populi frons durior hujus,
Qui sedet et spectat.—Juvenal.
-----
p. 57
We too, if I may name small things with great,
Are trebly curst in a triumvirate;
For Prentice, Morris, and the blockhead Clark,
Like poachers’ dogs, in yelping concert bark
At honest men. Bestow on one a kick,
The others join, and bite you to the quick.
Whatever counterfeit is coined by one,
The others stamp the current mark upon.
Offend the one—the fellow, wrong or right,
Secure of backers, scruples not to fight.*
Behold the bully butcher Prentice stand,
With ready cleaver lifted in his hand;
And, save his kindred crew, the world must feel
The ragged edge of that all smiting steel.
Does a poor author win some small renown?
With brutal fury Prentice knocks him down,
Stabs him—and still insatiate, turns around
His rusty knife within the victim’s wound.
Just or unjust, to him ’tis all the same;
No worth, no talent, his blind rage can tame.
On filthy chopping-block with murd’rous axe,
Many a better than himself he hacks
* The papers conducted by these worthies form, or rather formed a kind of Unholy Alliance, into which several minor powers were occasional[l]y admitted. I believe that Morris lately seceded from the league, and Prentice has abdicated.
-----
p. 58
Detested wretch, surcharg’d with spite and spleen,
Curst critic, literary Sawney Bean,†
Hast thou so long on human offal fed,
Slander’d and rail’d unchalleng’d for thy bread,
To think that none dare meet thee, eye to eye?
I’ll teach thee better, sirrah, by and by.
Back to thy shambles, and with Clark renew
Thine intercourse, with Mirror Morris too;
Praise and be praised by these and other bards,
As sharpers help each other cheat at cards:
Think not to office ’tis the certain way,
To soil the noble name of Henry Clay:
Go, seek a patron more upon thy level;
Go, plaster Andrew Jackson,—or the Devil;
† Sawney Bean was a Scotch robber and murderer, who fed on the bodies of his victims.
* Aude aliquid brevibus Gyaris et carcere dignum,
Si vis esse aliquis.—Juvenal.
This may seem harsh, nay, personal. I grant it so; but let the reader turn to a file of the New England Review, and if he has an appetite for garbage, he will therein find wherewith to gratify it. He will find rancor, indiscriminate abuse and blackguardism, by wholesale. I refer only to the time when Prentice conducted it. He will see not only Willis, but all his assistants, pursued for a whole year with the most bitter hostility. If he does not find enough in a single number to justify every word in the text, I will consent to stand reproved, now and forever.
This man has gone to Kentucky, and New-England is happily rid of him. It is said that he intends to write the life of Henry Clay, which may Heaven in its mercy forefend!
Note to Second Edition. He has written and published it.
-----
p. 59
Go, curry favor with the sire of crime,
Sure of the benefit some future time.*
The chief thus sped, his men shall share his fate;
I’ll throw my gauntlet at the second rate.
Port Folio Clark—but no—the game’s too small;
’Twill make him vain to mention him at all.
Now turn to Mirror Morris—he whose head
Is as the Fever River rich in lead:
Bear witness Brier Cliff, his paltry play,
His little “Mirror’s” false reflected ray,
His verse, in which so little sense is seen,
That e’en the author asks “What can it mean?”*
It means his voice, if fit for any thing,
Is fit to cry lost children, not to sing.
One bard there is I almost fear to name,
As doubting whether to applaud or blame.
In Percival’s† productions chaff and wheat,
Mix’d half and half, in just proportion meet;
* One of Morris’s pieces, which has had a wider circulation than the rest, has for its title and burthen these words,—“What can it mean? what can it mean?”
† I believe that Mr. Percival’s want of popularity is owing, in a great measure, to his poetic pride, which will not allow him to descend to cater for the prevailing taste. He will not deviate from his own standard of excellence, and what is worse, will bestow no care on his pieces. He ought to cultivate his talents.
-----
p. 60
But, duly bolted in my poem-mill,*
I find the better part is wholesome still.
Diffuse, wind-broken, feeble, out of joint,
Full half his lines have neither edge nor point;
The rest for many a mortal sin atone;
Such, even Bryant might be proud to own.
No more—unjust neglect has quench’d his fires,
And cank’ring rust corrodes his silent wires;
Alike unmindful now of praise or blame,
‘He sleeps, forgetful of his once bright fame.’ †
When Mediocrity his claims displays,
And frontless grasps at profit and at praise;
When critics join his praises to rehearse,
And pay him fifty dollars for his verse;
Such verse, as judging by the gaps and rents
In sense and sound, were dear at fifty cents;
To say which merits pity most is hard—†
The paying critics or receiving bard.
* We hear of grist-mills, saw-mills, &c.—Why should not this work be called a poet, or poem-mill? It would, perhaps, be more proper to call it a dunce-mill, but that would not suit the metre.
† Since I wrote the above, I have heard (with great pleasure) that Messrs. Percival and Bryant are about to collect and publish their several poems.
‡ Prosper Wetmore is the author of a volume of poems, of which “Lexington” is the principal. Lexington was pronounced the best of a number which were written for a prize of fifty dollars. What must the worst have been?
-----
p. 61
Undaunted Wetmore, what I most admire
In thee, is not thy fancy or thy fire;
On these thy qualities I need not touch;
Bryant and Halleck have, perhaps, as much:
No, ’tis thy matchless courage, that could squint
Twice at thy sheets, and yet resolve to print:
Of triple brass or steel thy nerves must be;
Certain damnation wakes no awe in thee.*
What though our fathers beat the British sore?
Beneath thy hand they suffer ten times more.
Alas! that same all mangling hand bestows
Upon our buried sires its random blows:
No British bullet made their marrow thrill,
As does, though cas’d in mould, great Wetmore’s quill.
It gives me Prosper Wetmore, small delight,
To pull thus rudely down thy little kite:
But, like a mad dog’s bite, thine ill, I’m sure
The actual cautery alone can cure:
The doctor, therefore, mindful of thy youth,†
Administers a dose of wholesome truth:
He tells thee, Prosper, that the laurel tree
Is yet a seed that bears one leaf for thee;
* Credite, me vobis folium recitare Sibyllæ.
† Though Prosper Wetmore is in the decline of life, this does not hinder him from being a very young poet, and that in more senses than one.
-----
p. 62
And bids thee, like thy namesake in the play,
To break thy staff, and fling thy book away.
Ye master tradesman, to my words give heed;
I’ll give ye counsel that ye greatly need;
Does any prentice take it in his head
To pen a stanza?—see him blister’d, bled,
If that wo’nt answer, turn him straight away,
Without twice thinking—he would never stay:
Or, to your tender feelings give the reins—
Do him an alms-deed, and beat out his brains.
Ye prentice boys, who one day would be men,
Stick to your handy-work—eschew the pen,
What sad exposure, and what bitter wo
Bad verses cause, shall Sammy Woodworth shew.
He too, like you, once earn’d his daily bread,
No matter how—it was not with his head;
Till blinded by some Jack o’ Lanthorn sprite
He took for Phœbus, he resolv’d to write.
One splend[i]d lyric to the future past,
His first thing excellent, as well as last.*
From that bright haystack fire no phœnix rose;
A goose its cinders merely did compose;
* The Bucket, did Woodworth credit. His novel and other subsequent productions I will not offend myself by naming. Thirty years of disappointment have not taught this unhappy person discretion. Even now a volume of his is announced as being in the press. Is it published?
-----
p. 63
Whose eggs, tho’ hatch’d with patient care and pain,
Brought neither empty praise nor solid gain:
And yet, untaught by many a pinching fast,
The foolish fowl will cackle to the last.
Woodworth is friendless, or, ’tis very clear
Advice had sav’d him from a notice here.
Chop wood, O Woodworth, make the anvil ring,
Dig mud, pick oakum, any thing but sing!
Ye, who to soar on paper wings prepare,
Be warn’d by Woodworth’s fall—in time beware.
Fresh lots of fools our markets yearly yield,
Whole cohorts from Manhattoes take the field;
As many more does Philadelphia rear;
Vide the pages of her Souvenir.
Time was when quite another race of men
Abode within the town of William Penn.
A broad brimm’d hat ensconc’d each careful head,
George Fox and Bunyan were the books they read;
Their strict economy and sterling sense
Gave no encouragement to fond pretence.
The times are chang’d—M’Henry, Smith, M’Call,*
And twenty more, like cats on house tops squall;
* M’Call is the author of a composition entitled ‘The Troubadour.’ He writes merely for amusement, and has it all to himself.
-----
p. 64
Nay, even Barker in the lists appears,
And yields the tribute of his “Smiles, and Tears,”*
In kind, with interest, I pay his toils,
Tears for his rashness, for his folly, smiles:
And when I listen as the tuneful dolt
Sings how a beast a little maid did bolt,
And gravely draws this moral from his song,
That maids to talk with beasts do very wrong,
I quite forget that now I rank with men,
And think I’m in my granny’s arms again.
Still Philadelphia some taste betrays;
She damns his poems, as she damn’d his plays;
But bred to stand the brunt of steel and fire,
He laughs to scorn the critic’s harmless ire.†
O miracle! What next! The greatest owl
Alive, salutes us with an Irish howl;
And with a screech of horrible distress
Proclaims the wonders of the ‘Wilderness.’
* The person here commemorated is the author of several plays, of which ‘Smiles and Tears’ is one. His poetic performances would be worse, were that possible, than his dramatic attempts. The thing (I call it so, for want of a term sufficiently contemptuous) mentioned in the text, is called ‘Little Red Riding Hood.’
† Mr. Barker was once a brave soldier, and since, an alderman; now he is a poet.
-----
p. 65
Cease, cease, M’Henry,* cease, for heaven’s dear sake,
Thy other drugs are bad enough to take:
Think of hte infamy thy novels gain’d;
Think of hte name of Washington profan’d:
Proceed not thus, still adding crime to crime—
What, what the Devil prompted thee to rhyme?
Wast ever where the fashion was in vogue
To woo the Muses in the Munster brogue?
Put by the pen—enough is given to fame!
Or rather, sooth to speak, Big O, to shame.
Purvey two broken stools, at trifling cost,
And one supplies the leg the other lost.
I’ll sell, dog-cheap, two men; (I won’t say fools)
Who buys, may treat them as he’d treat the stools.
Both are imperfect; yet if pains you take
The twain one perfect piece, perhaps, may make.
One’s not so wholly useless as the other,†
And therefore will I make him sell his brother,
Thompson is bad at sonnets, Smith at verse,‡
As bad at prose, and at the Drama worse.
* Peregrina est bellua. This fellow is an Irishman and a physician. In one of his novels (The Wilderness) he brings George Washington on his knees before his heroine! “Think of that Master Brook!” He has lately sinned in another sort; videlidet, in rhyme.
† Query. Which?
‡ Thompson is a poet merely; Smith is a poet and play-wright also. The principal of his abortions is entitled Caius Marius.
-----
p. 66
Who offers ninepence?—fourpence shall I say?
Take them for nothing, and with thanks away.
Unhappy Carolina; from thy birth
Afflicted more than any state on earth;
Curst in thy statesmen, in thy temper curst,
Curst in the helots whom thy swamps have nurs’d,
Curst in thy pepper politics, thy clime,
Thou art, to cap the climax, curst in rhyme!
To pluck the comet Glory* from its sphere,
A Pillar did Stylites Holland rear,
Compos’d of bulky words, big sounding strains,
Cemented loosely with his sodden brains.
Perch’d on the top, his eyes with tears ran o’er
To find his mark as distant as before;
And, giddy with the unexpected check,
He fell, and broke his reputation’s neck.
Then Allston took the field, resolv’d to do
Great things on canvass, and on paper too.
Four forms on foolscap straight the youth portray’d,
Like nothing our creator ever made,
And, puzzled much to give his work a name,
With desp’rate hand scrawl’d “Sylphs” † beneath the same.
* Edwin Holland is the author of the “Pillar of Glory,” and other poems. His Pillar proved a post on which he was picqueted.
† Allston is the author of a work called “The Sylphs of the [p. 67] Seasons.” It would be hard to speak as ill of it as it deserves, but this gentleman has risen in public estimation as a painter, in proportion as he has fallen as a poet. The artist, therefore, shall excuse the bard.
Carolina has produced several more rhymers, not worth naming.
-----
p. 67
List, northern bards, a bilious critic’s mouth
Gapes, like an ogre’s, in the distant South:
He bids ye “with a grateful heart to God,
Devour each day your pudding and your cod;”
He threatens, if ye heed him not, to do
The worst his feeble brain can prompt him to;
And “having purged his choler, spilt his gall,”
Informs ye that “he does despise ye all.”
Strange, strange, that such should feel contempt! perchance
He means retaliation in advance.
Well dost thou, J. L. M.* to hide thy nam,e
And let three capitals bespeak thy shame.
’Tis not, poor thing, thy fancied fire and strength;
Thy tedious, weary, lazy, leaden, lumbering length;
’Tis not the scurril coarseness of thy line
Draws on thy nothingness rebuke of mine:
* “Native Bards, a Satirical Effusion; by J. L. M.” made its appearance last summer. I do not speak of this affair as a critic, for it is beneath criticism—beneath contempt—but as a man who cannot see such an ebullition of utter spite without disgust and horror. Native Bards dates from Philadelphia, but contains intrinsic evidence of a more southern origin.
-----
p. 68
The sputt’ring spite that fills thy pin’s-head heart,
Compels my notice, cypher as thou art.
I know not what unhappy spot of earth
Claims the dishonor of thy parts and birth;
But leave it, wheresoe’er it be; repair
To dens where copper-heads, thy kindred, are:
Come never hither, lest we grant thy wish,
And serve thy calf’s—no—cod’s head in a dish.
Off hats, off hats! for lo! upon the stage
The Aristarchus of this scribbling age:
A man who knows that heated steel is hot,
That ice is cold—ye gods! what knows he not?
Art, science, metaphysics, and all that,
And the nine muses, strut beneath his hat:
Critiques dogmatic in his brain are bred;
O happy hat, to cover such a head!
‘Is Walsh,’ * you cry, ‘with inspiration big?
As well an elephant might dance a jig.’
* This critic is a striking verification of the adage, “the greatest clerks are not the wisest men.” In the multiplicity of his interminable scribblings, I defy his admirers to point out a single original thought, or one line of inspiration. He has not even gained a place in Pierpont’s common-place books. Still he writes on,
Et quodcunque semel chartis illeverit, omnes
Gestiet a furno rediuntes scire lacuque,
Et pueros et anus. Horace.
-----
p. 69
Alas! he writes no verses now; but once,
Before the gen’ral voice proclaim’d him dunce,
Such fruits of toil his sullied sheets confess’d,
As not e’en Kettle’s stomach could digest.
No room the worthy trash-collector found
For Robert’s poems in that burial-ground,
His book; but Robert, in his next review,
Set down poor Kettle for a blockhead too.*
A negro thus, whose shins his comrade hurts,
Their common color to reproach converts.
Stop Time, and though, perhaps, thy pinions ache,
A small addition to thy burthen take:
Take Bailey up, a worthy load, the same
Who made, long since, one happy snatch at fame;
Take Thatcher up, and give Longfellow place;
Let Hannah Gould thy world-broad shoulders grace:
If she among the greatest and the best
May find no vacant place, set down the rest:
* In damning Kettle’s book, Walsh says, “We too have written poems,” or words to that effect; and it seems from the tone of the article, that the insertion of Walsh’s lines among the “Specimens” would have had an important influence on the critic’s opinions. Perhaps I should not call the said book a burial ground. If Kettle buried some, he certainly performed the office of resurrection man for others.
Note extra, for the especial benefit of Mr. Walsh. The christian name of Bishop Porteus was Bielby, and not “Belly,” as the critic calls it in his edition of the British Poets.
-----
p. 70
Give Holmes a ride, the muses’ youngest son,
Equall’d by few, surpass’d by none, not one—
A dawn of worth, in whose meridian blaze
Bryant with effort shall retain his bays.
Take these, and bear them down to future years;
If thus increas’d, thy load too great appears,
If easily thou couldst contrive to set
The hero and his whilome cabinet
Adrift, just so far on their downward road
As where John Milton’s hero makes abode;
A nation’s gratitude, O Time, were thine,
And nobly settled were these fares of mine.
The roll is call’d, my work is almost done—
The last and greatest name remains alone:
But ill the censor’s public debt were paid
To slight the mighty master of the trade.
Sea[r]ch the rich stores of Greek and Roman lore,
Or turn the page of modern letters o’er;
But look for nothing better, in its kind,
Than that which bears the impress of the mind
Of Bryant;* he who shines without a peer,
The brightest star that lights our hemisphere:
Clear, smooth, and strong, with classic beauty grac’d,
He writes no line his friends could wish effac’d;
* Ingenium cui sit, cui mens divinior atque os
Magna sonaturum, des nominis hujus honorem.
-----
p. 71
And, like a certain potentate of old,
Whate’er he touches he converts to gold.
Few are his gems, but worth a mighty sum;—
None but Pitt diamonds from his work-shop come.
Write, Bryant, write; the land’s reproach redeem;
Exalt thy country in the world’s esteem.
Whatever theme inspires, I’m sure of this,
That if thou wouldst, thou canst not write amiss.
Now have I thump’d each lout I meant to thump,
And my worn pen exhibits but a stump;
Now have I shot my shafts at beast and brute,
And trampled reptiles with my spurning foot:
Many have suffer’d, many gone scot-free,—
As all unworthy of a shot from me.
Let those who deem their laurels still unshorn,
For such forbearance thank my utter scorn;
And those to whose reform my censures tend,
Bow to the staff in sorrow, and amend.
I’ve driven the scalpel deeply, to be sure;
But desp’rate means a desp’rate ill must cure.
Let Candor judge what motive nerv’d my arm,
And if I meant my country good, or harm;
For the bought suffrage of a venal press,
I prize it little, and I fear it less.
For ye whose backs, and sides, and shoulders till
Twinge with my blows, and, may be, ever ill;
-----
p. 72
Whose yard-long ears my honest muse offends,
I’ll tell ye, dunces, how to get amends:
To my poor lines be just such treatment shown
(For that’s your worst) as each has given his own.
To those who listen to my humble lay,
Untouch’d and unattempted, let me say;
No private malice on my course propell’d,
No anger spurr’d me, and no fear withheld;
In these my strictures on my fellow men,
Truth held the light, and CONSCIENCE drove the pen.